Library/Market Making In PMs Sucks
MicrostructureAnalysis

Market Making In PMs Sucks

Lotus·April 21, 2026·Twitter
prediction markets don't reward passive liquidity, they punish it like underwriting catastrophe risk

Why It's Worth Reading

Survey of recent research on why conventional market making fails in prediction markets. Covers cross-venue fragmentation (the same contract at 58-67 cents on different platforms), the January 2026 Polymarket XRP exploit that paid $231K on thin weekend liquidity, Kalshi's structural longshot bias, and evidence from 150M Polymarket trades that the top 5% skilled traders earned $228M while spread capture barely moves P&L. Concludes passive LPs on these venues behave more like underwriters of terminal risk than classical market makers.

Extensive technical background assumed

Concepts

Platforms mentioned: Polymarket, Kalshi

Related Reading